Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino (2000) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video SummaryProbando Slot De Casinos En L铆nea De M茅xico Winner Parte 4 Ahi Poke Receta Casino Royale Credits Casino Royale Monterrey Incendio .
The plaintiffs, Rena and Sheldon Gottlieb, claimed they won $1 million at Tropicana Casino, but Tropicana denied their claim. The case involves a dispute over whether participation in the promotion constituted consideration for an enforceable contract, and which state's law applies. The court must also determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact that would preclude summary judgment. The facts most relevant to the court's analysis are whether Ms. Gottlieb provided adequate consideration to form a contract with Tropicana by participating in the promotion, whether the promotion met the legal definition of an illegal lottery under the New Jersey Criminal Code, and whether there is enough evidence to create a factual dispute about whether or not she won the million dollar prize. Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino (2000) United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 109 F. Supp. 2d 324 Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/gottlieb-v-tropicana-hotel-casino-100696885 --- Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite. Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text. Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1